Gestational Diabetes Trio, Featuring A Special Interview with Dr. Donald Coustan

Happy Holidays to all, and to celebrate the season we have a very sweet triple episode release today! The first two episodes are focused on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of GDM, while the third is a special interview with Dr. Donald Coustan, Professor and Chair Emeritus of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Brown University. Dr. Coustan was recently profiled by AJOG as a “Giant in Obstetrics and Gynecology.” We hope you enjoy the interview and his perspective on GDM and OB-GYN more generally.

The ACOG PB (PB 190) on GDM was recently updated in February 2018. There is also a new bulletin on Pregestational Diabetes (PB 201), though we don’t spend much time on pregestational diabetes today.

We discuss multiple ways to diagnose GDM, based on different organization’s recommendations. The classic Carpenter-Coustan criteria endorsed by ACOG and the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) are based on two-step testing. An initial 50 gram glucose tolerance test is performed, and patients move on to the second screen if their 1hr glucose is measured at 130-140 mg/dL, pending on the institution. It is generally accepted that a value >200 mg/dL is diagnostic without moving on to the second step.

The three hour test is based on a 100g glucose load. The cutoffs vary by time point. Two elevated values are needed to diagnose GDM; however, there is increased risk for the patient even with just one elevated value on three hour testing. The classic Carpenter-Coustan criteria as well as the NDDG criteria are shown here from PB 190:

ACOG PB 190: The Carpenter-Coustan criteria are the most commonly used in the USA.

There is also single-step testing proposed by the International Association for the Study of Diabetes in Pregnancy, that uses a 75g, two-hour glucose tolerance test. Any one elevated value (fasting > 92, 1 hour > 180, or 2 hour > 153) is diagnostic of GDM, and no second screen is needed. The ADA has endorsed these criteria recently but also admits that there is not clear-cut evidence to support one screening strategy over another. ACOG endorses the two-step screening at this time.

Much of the research regarding treatment of GDM that we review in the podcast is well-reviewed in PB 190, so we won’t rehash it here. If non-pharmacologic treatments fail (monitored fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels are consistently elevated), an oral agent or insulin is required, with insulin being the gold-standard. How do you initiate insulin? See our guide below!

And remember — postpartum patients with GDM need a 2 hour, 75 gram glucose tolerance test between 4 and 12 weeks postpartum to rule out type 2 diabetes. A fasting > 125 or a 2 hour > 200 is diagnostic. A fasting between 100-125 or a 2 hour between 140-199 demonstrates impaired glucose tolerance. And even with normal values, anyone with GDM has a 15-70% chance of developing T2DM later in life, so it’s an important part of the pregnancy history to correspond back to the patient’s PCP.

Biostatistics Part II

Welcome back to biostatistics! Today we spend some time on study design and study-specific statistical calculations.

If you have more time, check out the Khan Academy series of videos and infographics on statistics and study design. Their resources are phenomenal and can really help with both understanding CREOG questions as well as helping you out in your own research design!

And for a concise review, check out our own quick notes on the subject.

Biostatistics Part I

On today’s episode, we try to tackle the highly testable, last-minute-cram topic of biostatistics! This will be the first in a two part series. Sorry about the sound issues — had some problems with Nick’s microphone, but should be fixed after this series!

Below is the official cheat sheet of equations from us for this episode. Hopefully this is helpful in guiding your studying! And stay tuned for next week when we talk more about study design and study-specific statistics.

We also talk about a few other statistical points today:

Prevalence represents the number of people in a population who have a disease. From the above table, this could be calculated as (A+C) / (A+B+C+D).

Likelihood ratio is a value that can represent the significance or utility of a diagnostic test, and is calculated as Sensitivity / 1 - Specificity. In other words, the true positive rate divided by the false positive rate.

An LR > 1 signifies the test is associated with the disease.
An LR < 1 signifies the test is associated with absence of a disease.
An LR that is close to 1 demonstrates the test doesn’t have a strong association with either presence or absence of disease.

Why use LR? If you know the prevalence of disease in a population, you know the pre-test probability of the patient in front of you having the disease. An LR away from 1 demonstrates that your post-test probability is more likely to make you certain of diagnosis. LR of close to 1 doesn’t change your pre-test probability.

Perioperative Care and Optimization for GYN Patients

Today we’re featuring a special guest on the Podcast! Dr. Lauren Stewart is a current PGY-6 in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery here at Brown / Women and Infants. Lauren has special interest in perioperative care strategies in GYN, and has published a two-part series on the subject in “Topics in Obstetrics and Gynecology.”

It is a venti episode - a bit longer, but chock full of useful information!

While we can’t share Lauren’s articles directly due to paywall restrictions, you can find them here if your institution has a subscription: Part 1 and Part 2.

At the beginning of this episode, we discuss a number of systems you can utilize for preoperative evaluation of risk for patients, each with their own sets of pros and cons:
American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Status Classification
Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI)
American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Risk Calculator

In addition, ACOG does have some publications that can aide with your perioperative management:
-PB 195 - Preventing Infection after GYN Surgery
-CO 750 - Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
-PB 084 - Prevention of DVT/PE

The Caprini score we talk about in the podcast is a common tool for deciding on perioperative mechanical vs. pharmacological DVT prophylaxis, and is the scale recommended in the 2012 CHEST guidelines for VTE prophylaxis in non-orthopedic surgical patients. MD Calc has an excellent appraisal of the evidence as well as an interactive Caprini calculator for your use.

The Caprini score for VTE prevention in surgical patients

For antibiotic prophylaxis, this table from PB 195 is very handy review for CREOGs:

ACOG PB 195 - for further review of evidence, see full text.



Espresso: Medical Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage

Welcome to our first Espresso Episode! Just like an espresso, this should be a short, sweet, but highly caffeinated review of more familiar topics. These are intended for rapid-fire review — perfect for while you’re running up to that postpartum hemorrhage!

In today’s episode, we really just stick to the medication management for postpartum hemorrhage, though as anyone with experience with these might remember, there are a lot more components than just these medicines to make hemorrhage management successful. That said, an exam, bimanual massage, and uterotonic agents will resolve many of the cases you’ll see on the floor. More important for CREOGs are likely the dosing and side effects of these medicines, which we also review today. The ACOG PB 183 table on these medicines is also below for visual learners.

For when you have a bit more time to sit and breathe after the run up the stairs, check out ACOG PB 183 to review postpartum hemorrhage in full (ACOG membership required).

ACOG PB 183