New Labor Guidance, Part 3
/Previous podcasts:
Part 2 of Preventing the Primary Cesarean (old - for comparison)
Limiting Interventions in Labor and Birth (based on CO 766)
Also check out for reading for this podcast specifically:
- Committee Opinion 766 on Approaches to Limiting Intervention in Labor and Birth
Continuous labor support
Defined: continuous presence of support personnel or the continuous presence of a one-on-one person for support.
This support comes in many forms, including:
Emotional support
Information about labor progress
Advice about coping techniques
Providing/facilitating comfort measures
Speaking up on behalf of the pregnant individual, when needed
Noted in CPG8 as “one of the most effective tools to improve labor and delivery outcomes.”
Systematic review: pregnant women allocated to continuous support benefitted from:
More likely to have SVD (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04 - 1.12)
Less likely to have negative feelings of childbirth experience (RR 0.69, CI 0.59 - 0.79)
Less likely to use any intrapartum analgesia (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.64 - 0.88).
Have shorter labors (-0.69 hrs; 95% CI -1.04 to -0.34)
Less likely to have cesarean birth (RR 0.75, CI 0.64 - 0.88)
Less likely to have operative vaginal delivery (RR 0.90, CI 0.85 - 0.96)
Less likely to have neonate with 5-min Apgar < 7 (0.62, CI 0.46 - 0.85)
CPG 8 notes that OB/Gyns and health care providers/organizations should strive to develop policies and programs to integrate trained support personnel into intrapartum care to provide one-to-one support for laboring persons.
The Peanut Ball
Elongated, peanut-shaped ball, typically placed between a patient’s legs during labor while the patient is side-lying in order to “open up the pelvis.”
In theory, this mimics upright positioning with the opening of the pelvis.
A systematic review of four randomized trials of 648 patients found no significant difference for time in labor or incidence of vaginal delivery/cesarean delivery with peanut ball use.
There were nonsignificant trends towards improving vaginal delivery rates and shortening first stage length
However, evidence is further limited as guidance for how to use, what size to use, how long to use, when to use…
How the peanut ball is implemented in labor courses is heterogenous and driven a lot by personal/nursing experience.
More studies are needed to understand when/if it might be efficacious in particular scenarios.
Position Change and Ambulation
Similarly to the peanut ball, there are many opinions on this!
Observational studies find that patients assume many different positions during labor when left to their own devices on what is comfortable.
A meta-analysis comparing upright positioning (sitting/standing/kneeling), ambulation, or both with recumbent, lateral, or supine positions during first stage of labor found that upright positions:
Reduced first stage length by approximately 1h 22 min (95% CI -2.22 to -0.51 hr)
Less likely to undergo cesarean (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.94)
A separate review found no differences in these factors, but found reduced trauma to pelvic floor for those in kneeling position.
CPG 8 encourages position changes to enhance maternal comfort and promote optimal fetal positioning.
Hydration modalities
CPG 8 notes that IV hydration is safe, but limits freedom of movement and overall may not be necessary
Oral hydration can be encouraged to meet caloric and hydration needs.
They review a systematic review comparing 250cc/hr of IV fluid to 125cc/h in low risk patients in spontaneous labor at term, demonstrating a lower risk of cesrean for any indication in the 250cc/hr group (12.5% vs 18.1%, RR 0.70).
Higher fluid rates also shortened duration of labor by mean of about 1 hour, and second stage specifically by just under 3 mins.
Also did not observe increasing maternal or neonatal morbidities, including pulmonary edema.
Recommended increased hydration for nulliparous women when oral intake is restricted.
Further study is needed to compare when oral intake / oral hydration is not restricted; when patients are undergoing induction of labor; or if comorbidities exist.
Cervical examinations
Frequency of cervical examination is frequently cited as a concern for infection, and has to be balanced against understanding labor progress and preventing arrest/dystocia.
The CPG authors note a retrospective cohort study of 2400 patients over 4 years showing no significant association between number of cervical exams in labor and intrapartum fever.
The association was also not present when confined to exams after amniotomy.