Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV

Reading: 

What is PrEP?

  • Pre-exposure prophylaxis specifically for prevention of HIV 

  • Use of antiretroviral medication to individuals who do not have HIV, but are at risk for it.

    • Has been recommended by the CDC since 2012.

Why is PrEP needed?

  • HIV remains a significant public health problem in the USA and around the world.

    • 1.2 million persons have HIV as of 2021, with 87% aware of their diagnosis.

    • About 36,000 people receive HIV diagnosis per year.

      • Heterosexual contact accounts for ~22% of all HIV diagnoses.

      • Injection drug use accounts for ~7% of diagnoses.

    • The majority of new infections occur during reproductive years – about 20k of the 36k diagnoses per year are under the age of 35.

    • Persons of color and trans persons are disproportionately affected – and PrEP can be part of solution to fight inequity.

  • PrEP is effective, but underutilized:

    • 23% of persons who can benefit from PrEP are prescribed it – lots of room for improvement!

    • Discuss more on efficacy later.

    • As part of CDC’s End the HIV Epidemic initiative, they hope to increase PrEP coverage to 50% by 2025.

How effective is PrEP?

  • Very! Let’s quickly review some major trial data in heterosexual couples:

  • 2012: TDF2 Study Group, NEJM

    • RCT in Botswana randomizing to daily tenofovir-emtricitabine or placebo.

      • Two reverse transcriptase inhibitors

      • Brand names: Truvada, Descovy

    • 1219 men and women underwent randomization (45.7% women) and followed for a median of 1.1 years, but max 3.7 years.

    • 9 persons in treatment group and 24 persons in the placebo group became infected.

      • Estimated efficacy: 62.2%.

      • Higher rates of nausea/vomiting and dizziness in treatment group, but not long enough following to determine long-term safety data.

  • 2012: Partners PrEP Study Team, NEJM.

    • RCT in Kenya and Uganda for HIV-1 serodiscordant heterosexual couples, with three arms: daily tenofovir; daily combination tenofovir-emtricitabine; or placebo.

    • 4747 couples were followed.

      • In 38% of couples, the seronegative partner was female.

    • 17 infections in the tenofovir group; 13 infections in the combo drug group; and 52 infections in the placebo group.

      • Risk reduction of 67% with tenofovir alone, and 75% with the combo drug.

      • Rates of serious adverse events similar across groups.

  • 2012: FEM-PrEP Study Group, NEJM

    • RCT in multiple countries in Africa 

    • 2120 HIV-negative women to tenofovir-emtricitabine or placebo daily over two years.

    • 33 infections in combo drug group, 35 infections in placebo group.

      • No difference. Why?

        • Hypothesized that adherence was poor – while pill-count data suggested 88% of meds were taken, drug level testing suggested target plasma level was only identified in about 25% of participants tested.

        • Remember that a daily pill regimen can be challenging!

  • The CDC currently says that PrEP is:

    • 99% effective in reducing risk of HIV acquisition from sexual activity

    • 74% effective in reducing risk of HIV acquisition from IV drug use, when taken as prescribed.

CDC - PREP GUIDANCE

CDC - PREP GUIDANCE

Who should receive PrEP?

  • Patients at the highest risk are those who do not have HIV, but are known to have a male sexual partner that is infected with HIV (a “sero-discordant couple”). 

  • Other high-risk candidates where PrEP should be prescribed:

    • Engage in sexual activity within high HIV-prevalence area or social network, with:

      • Limited or no condom use

      • Diagnosis of other STIs

      • Use of IV drugs or alcohol dependence, or both

      • Incarceration

      • Exchange of sex for commodities, such as drugs, shelter, food, or money

  • Otherwise – if your patient is sexually active, with a partner with unknown HIV status or if they’ve had a bacterial STI in the last six months – it’s a good idea to at least discuss PrEP!

    • Currently, the CDC has a very simple flowsheet for determining if PrEP prescriptions are immediately appropriate. But discuss with your sexually active patients!

      • Including adolescents – ACOG Practice Advisory was a limited update to encourage PrEP discussion in this population.

      • PrEP is OK for anyone > 35 kg / 77 lbs.

How should I prescribe PrEP?

  • Preparation:

    • Determine baseline HIV status with testing – if positive, need treatment, not PrEP

      • Remember – if they’ve had a potential HIV exposure or acute HIV infection symptoms in prior 4 weeks, may need re-testing before determining if they are positive.

    • Determine STI status for other infections such as gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis.

    • Assess hepatitis B status

      • Because emtricitabine and tenofovir can be used to treat hepatitis B, it’s important to test for this – stopping the medicine suddenly in an infected person can lead to rebound hepatitis.

        • If HBV is found or a patient is known to be HBV positive → counsel about this risk and monitor LFTs / HBV viral loads if they discontinue PrEP.

    • Assess kidney function:

      • Oral tenofovir can cause some minor renal damage, and rarely acute renal failure.

        • If CrCl > 60 mL/min, OK to proceed with oral PrEP.

        • If CrCl > 30 mL/min, OK to proceed with injectable PrEP (more on that later!)

    • Assess lipid profile:

      • Oral PrEP may cause changes in lipid profile – baseline assessment should be performed with triglycerides.

    • Same day prescribing of PrEP is OK for most patients as these labs are drawn – but do not prescribe in patients where testing can’t be obtained, patients with concerning history for acute HIV infection or renal disease/associated conditions, or without confirmed means of contact for discussing lab results.

  • Medications and Monitoring:

    • Daily Oral PrEP:

      • Truvada or Descovy (both are combinations of emtricitabine and tenofovir)

        • Truvada has been approved for heterosexual women, as well as MSM and trans women.

        • Descovy has been approved only for MSM and trans women (not for heterosexual women).

      • Patients should be monitored with:

        • HIV testing q3 months

        • Syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia testing approximatley every 6 months

        • Creatinine clearance estimate every 6 months

        • Lipid panel yearly

    • Injectable PrEP:

      • Relatively new (Dec. 2021): injectable cabotegravir (brand name: Apretude)

        • FDA approved for heterosexual women, MSM, and trans women at risk of HIV infection.

        • Injection schedule is 2 injections x 1 month apart, followed by q2 month injection.

      • Patients should be monitored with recommended surveillance STI testing:

        • HIV testing with every injection visit

        • Gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis on an approximately every 6 month basis.

    • 2-1-1 Oral PrEP

      • This is event-driven / “coitally-timed” PrEP.

        • This can be used by adult MSM, but is not recommended by the CDC and not FDA approved at this time. 

        • It hasn’t been studied in heterosexual women or trans patients.

What if my patient becomes pregnant on PrEP?

  • Women seeking to conceive and pregnant/breastfeeding women can use oral PrEP.

  • Important to understand in HIV is the “undetectable, untransmissible” or U/U principle:

    • Women whose sexual partner has a viral load <200 copies/mL have effectively no risk of sexual acquisition.

      • If partner remains on maximally effective antiretroviral therapy and has undetectable VL, PrEP may not provide additional protective benefit.

    • PrEP may be continued if desired, and a antiretroviral pregnancy registry is available to prospectively and anonymously submit information to obtain further data (www.apregistry.com


Further info

  • The CDC maintains a very extensive prescriber’s guide that is worth looking through to implement your own PrEP practice!

    • There is also a National Clinician Consultation Center at 855-448-7737 (855-HIV-PREP) that is available 9A to 8P ET on M-F to have clinician consultation for testing, prevention, treatment, and pre-exposure prophylaxis, and post-exposure prophylaxis resources.

  • The ACOG Practice Advisory also notes PrEP is widely covered with state Medicaid as preventive healthcare, and medication assistance is widely available – check out the end of the advisory for a list of resources.

HIV in the Pregnant Patient

Today we go into part 2 of our HIV series, this time focusing on pregnancy and HIV. Check out ACOG CO 752 (Prenatal and Perinatal HIV Screening) and CO 751 (Labor and Delivery Management of Women with HIV).

However, we have to give a major shout out to the OBG Project — their editors have put out an awesome summary of HIV in pregnancy and preventing vertical transmission: Check it out here.

(c) OBG Project

One of the important CREOG points on HIV in pregnancy includes drug interactions. Methergine is metabolized by CYP3A4 enzymes, which may be inhibited by certain antiretrovirals. Thus, methergine should be avoided if possible if encountering postpartum hemorrhage.

Lastly, we wanted to drive home the point again about patient autonomy, especially regarding risk of cesarean delivery. We put the ACOG CO text below for you to chew on!

ACOG CO 751

HIV in the Non-Pregnant Patient

We jump back to our STI saga to cover HIV today. ACOG PB 167 and CO 596 make for supplementary reading for this show.

The CDC and USPSTF recommend at least one-time HIV screening in most women. The CDC goes further to recommend up to annual screening in certain high-risk groups, including IV drug users, > 1 sex partner annually or known sex partner with HIV, those who exchange sex for money or goods, and MSM.

Screening is important, because almost 25% of new cases occur in women, and heterosexual intimate contact is the most common form of disease spreading. ACOG subscribes to a philosophy of “opt out” testing, by which HIV screening should be considered routine, with the patient able to opt out. Physicians need to document the reason for this in their notes. Screening tests are broken into rapid and confirmatory. A positive rapid screen should always be followed with a confirmatory test, as the rapid screens have high sensitivity, but lower specificity.

GYN care may vary somewhat with positive HIV status. For Pap smears, PB 167 describes an appropriate algorithm for dealing with initial screening and some positive results:

ACOG PB 167

ACOG PB 167

We spend some time reviewing the treatment of other STIs in the podcast briefly, all of which are reviewed in PB 167 as well. Highlights include:

  • Using 1 week rather than single-dose metronidazole treatment for trichomonal infections

  • Re-testing any positive GC/CT testing result at 3 months, due to high risk of re-infection

  • Screening for most STIs at entry to care for HIV-affected patients.

Birth control is also another important topic for HIV-affected patients. ACOG and the CDC recommend use of dual-contraception — that is, a barrier method and a hormonal method — to prevent viral spread. Certain forms of hormonal contraception may be affected by antiretroviral drugs:

  • CHCs: The NNRTI non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor efavirenz and certain protease inhibitors (-navir) may decrease efficacy of combined methods by reducing contraceptive hormone levels; however, they are considered US MEC Category 2.

    • The exception to this rule is fosamprenavir, as CHCs also lead to decreased levels of this protease inhibitor (US MEC 3).

  • Etonogestrel implant:  Similarly to CHCs, there are theoretical risks in decreased contraceptive effectiveness for patients on efavirenz; however, the implant remains US MEC 2.

  • DMPA: MEC category 1 for all users, except for those on fosamprenavir; there is limited evidence DMPA decreases fosamprenavir levels like CHCs (US MEC 2).

  • IUDs: MEC category 1 for all users!

  • Emergency contraception: for oral medicatons such as levenorgestrel and ulipristal, these should be offered to HIV-affected women as the benefits of emergency contraception are considered to outweigh the risks in this group. Similarly to CHCs, there is theoretical risk of decreased efficacy of these methods among women taking efavirenz.

Finally, in a preview to our next episode, we talk about preconception counseling for HIV-affected patients. The goal for any patient with HIV is to achieve a negative viral load, and for OB-GYNs, this is important to limit vertical transmission. Efavirenz has been associated with neural tube defects, so should be avoided in pregnancy if possible.

Conceiving is safest through artificial insemination. However, if natural conception is desired. OB-GYNs should discuss limiting unprotected intercourse to ovulatory times, and using pre-exposure prophylaxis for the patient, or her partner, in serodiscordant couples. This generally involves a daily regimen of tenofovir/emtricitabine (Truvada) for 1 month prior to, and 1 month after, conception. Risk reduction is estimated to be somewhere between 63-75%, and the best-available data suggests this is likely safe.