New Labor Guidance, Part 1

Back in 2019 we did a two-part series on preventing the primary cesarean (part 1, part 2). That series was based on the joint ACOG/SMFM Obstetric Care Consensus #1. As of the January edition of the Green Journal, ACOG & SMFM have now issued revised guidance in Clinical Practice Guideline #8 that retires the old document and shakes some things up a bit! 

In that spirit, we’ll review some definitions following CPG 8 and remark on some of the new changes as we go along.

Part two of CPG 8 also reviews evidence behind some ways to limit intervention in labor and delivery – we’ve podcasted on that before, too – but we’ll save that for a future episode.

Some definitions to get started:

  • Labor: onset of regular, painful uterine contractions resulting in cervical dilation, effacement, or both.

    • First stage: the time period from labor onset until full dilation (10 cm) is achieved. This is broken down into:

      • Latent phase: gradual, slow, early cervical change.

      • Active phase: time period of more rapid, predictable cervical change.

    • Second stage: the time period from complete dilation until delivery of the fetus, characterized by maternal pushing efforts.

    • Third stage: the time period from delivery of the fetus until delivery of the placenta.

  • How did we come up with these stages?

    • 1950s: Emanuel Friedman publishes graphs of cervical dilation of 1,000 term patients admitted to the hospital in spontaneous labor, and describe the period of rapid cervical change that characterizes “latent” from “active” first stage, in addition to a “deceleration” phase near the end of first stage.

      • This transition from latent to active in his data was thought to occur at around 4cm cervical dilation.

      • The 95%ile for active phase dilation was 1.2 cm/h in nulliparas, and 1.5cm/h in multiparas.

    • 2010: Zhang et al publish updated data using the Consortium for Safe Labor

      • Almost 63,000 term patients at 19 US hospitals with normal perinatal outcomes. Key takeaways:

        • The transition point from latent to active seemed to occur at around 6cm in both nulliparas and multparas, later than Friedman observed.

        • The rate of active phase cervical dilation was also slower than Friedman’s observations:

          • Nulliparas: 0.5 - 0.7 cm/h

          • Multiparas: 0.5 - 1.3 cm/h

    • Since 2010, multiple other studies using large data sets have been published – they’re too numerous to review, but in short, there seem to be several clinical factors that might affect labor progress.

      • Obesity

      • Hypertension

      • Gestational age

      • Multiple gestations

      • Presence of fetal anomalies

      • Fetal size

      • Fetal sex

Latent Phase of First Stage

  • In the Friedman curve, they demonstrated a 95%ile of latent phase length ranging from 14h in multiparas to 20h in nulliparas. 

  • Subsequently, in the Zhang and other curves, the data was all over the place. A conservative 95th percentile, per ACOG, seems to be around 16 hours.

    • Likely, this has something to do more with when someone is admitted to the hospital, and characterizing the length of latent phase is difficult to do.

    • Prolonged latent phase is somewhat associated with adverse obstetrical outcomes, but

    • The vast majority of people who have prolonged latent phase will either:

      • 1) stop contracting, or

      • 2) achieve active phase, particularly with amniotomy or oxytocin augmentation.

  • Therefore, there is no recommendation for defining “arrest of latent phase” or “failed latent phase.” 

    • As long as maternal and fetal status are appropriate, latent phase may continue.

    • Not changed from prior guidance.

  • What about induced labor and latent phase?

    • Induced labor is different - there is a definition of “failed induction of labor.”

      • Induced labor has a much longer potential latent phase, so the guidance is very conservative in order to maximize opportunities to get the patient into the active phase.

      • Recommendation: Oxytocin should be administered for a minimum of 12-18 hours after membrane rupture before deeming induction unsuccessful.

        • This recommendation is provided otherwise reassuring maternal/fetal status.

        • Going beyond 18 hours can be discussed with patients on an individual basis.

          • This recommendation is based on studies demonstrating only about 5% of patients remain in latent phase after amniotomy with oxytocin administration after 18h. 

          • This is largely an unchanged recommendation, but the previous Obstetric Care Consensus mentioned waiting until 24 hours.

            • Acknowledged this was based on expert opinion

            • So in the context of the CPG, shared-decision making is recommended rather than overtly recommending a 24 hour period after amniotomy to diagnose failed induction. 

Active Phase of First Stage

  • ACOG definitively puts forth a recommendation: the active phase of labor is denoted at 6cm dilation

    • This is based on the more conservative Zhang data

    • They acknowledge there may be a range of individualized starting points between 4-6cm based on individual patients.

      • The 6cm standard for active phase management allows as many as possible to be ruled in for active phase before the more stringent arrest definitions are applied.

      • Not changed from prior guidance (Obstetric Care Consensus).

  • ACOG defines active phase arrest in one of two ways:

    • No progression in cervical dilation after 6cm with rupture of membranes despite adequate contractions for 4 hours, or

    • No progression in cervical dilation after 6cm with rupture of membranes despite inadequate contractions and oxytocin augmentation for 6 hours.

      • Versus the old document, this is largely unchanged.

      • A protracted active phase can be conservatively defined as less than 1cm of cervical change in 2 hours.

    • They note slow, but progressive, labor in the first stage should not be an indication for cesarean:

      • A prospective study of over 300 patients with dysfunctional labor, when provided 4 additional hours of oxytocin, 50.7% of nulliparas and 41.7% of multiparas ultimately delivered vaginally.

        • This would have equated to a cesarean rate of over 35% without the additional time, versus just 18% with the additional time. 

  • Since providing these recommendations in 2014 with the original Obstetric Care Consensus, real-life benefit to cesarean rates have been mixed / modest at best.

    • There is not much data at all regarding maternal/neonatal morbidity.

    • However, the CPG authors describe that this approach likely balances risks of prolonged labor with benefits of avoiding cesarean in a safe way, based on the best data available. 

Managing an Abnormal First Stage of Labor

  • New to this document is an endorsement of an active management approach to the first stage of labor, which includes:

    • Standard criteria for diagnosis of arrest of labor

    • Early amniotomy

    • Administration of oxytocin for protracted labor

    • One-to-one nursing care

      • Studies of active management have not shown reduction in cesarean rates, but do point towards lower rates of maternal fever and shorter duration of labor.

      • Thus, knowing risks of protracted labor, ACOG endorses active management - new to this CPG and stands out as an addition versus the prior Obstetric Care Consensus.

        • Let’s review the components - we just talked about arrest definitions, so next we’ll talk:

  • Amniotomy

    • ACOG recommends amniotomy for patients undergoing augmentation or induction of labor to reduce the duration of labor.

      • An AHRQ-based systematic review of amniotomy in spontaneous labor determined that it helped reduce length of labor in nullliparas, without increasing risk for cesarean delivery, maternal infection, trauma to the pelvic floor, or postpartum hemorrhage.

        • There was no difference in rate of cord prolapse, either, in any of the randomized trials analyzed.

    • When should I perform amniotomy?

      • This in the literature is broken down into early vs late, where “early” is often defined as amniotomy as soon as feasible.

        • In one RCT, this was within 1 hour of Foley removal when used for cervical ripening, versus late being beyond 1 hour - higher rates of vaginal delivery within 24h and shorter labor duration in early group.

        • Another RCT - amniotomy concurrent with oxytocin starting, vs 4 hours after starting oxytocin – demonstrated shorter labor length in nulliparas and no effect on cesarean delivery rates.

        • Systematic review of four other RCTs of induced labor - average labor reduction of 5 hours, with similar rates of cesarean and no increasing risks of complications.

          • ACOG concludes that “there is high-quality evidence to recommend early amniotomy as adjunctive to the labor process” – a really significant new recommendation! 

  • Oxytocin use

    • ACOG recommends either high-dose or low-dose oxytocin regimens as reasonable to use with active labor management to reduce operative deliveries.

      • Similar to amniotomy, ACOG first discusses early vs late oxytocin augmentation, where early is defined as starting oxytocin once prolonged active phase is identified:

        • A few meta-analyses demonstrate modest increases in likelihood of vaginal delivery and modest reduction in cesarean birth.

      • Probably of more controversy is the use of high-dose vs low-dose protocols.

        • Low dose protocols generally use a starting dose of 0.5 - 2.0 mU/min, and increase by 1-2 mU/min every 15-40 minutes.

        • High dose protocols use a starting dose of 4 mU/min or higher, and increase by 3-6 mU/min every 15-40 minutes.

        • The data does not demonstrate any improved or worsened outcomes with one approach versus another, so ACOG states either approach is reasonable.

          • The previously-mentioned AHRQ systematic review did demonstrate lower cesarean rates and no difference in hemorrhage for nulliparous patients undergoing high-dose protocols – worth a consideration.

        • ACOG also notes a maximum dose of oxytocin has not been established – that was news to me!

    • ACOG does add a recommendation to use IUPCs in patients with protracted active labor, or in those whose contractions cannot be monitored externally.

      • They note IUPCs are a useful tool to help titrate oxytocin while also not causing or increasing adverse events.

      • Recall, 200 Montevideo units (MVUs) define adequacy, when looking at contraction strength in a ten-minute period.

        • There is some limited evidence that cesarean delivery is more likely with lower MVUs; but these cut offs, patterns of contractions, and definition of adequacy all need more study!

Limiting Intervention in Labor and Birth

Check out ACOG CO 766 for more on this subject!

Patients in labor and delivery have more information (whether accurate or inaccurate) than ever before to inform their opinions, choices, and risk tolerance.

  • One certainty - more patients are choosing birth centers and home birth as a perceived way to reduce intervention and promote physiologic labor

  • Today we review practices that are worth reviewing on your unit to limit intervention, when appropriate, in a generally low-risk patient; we are not advocating for non-intervention, to be clear! 

Coping in Labor Techniques

Continuous Emotional Support in Labor

  • Randomized trial evidence supports use! 

  • Continuous labor support:

    • Shorter labor

    • Decreased need for analgesia

    • Fewer operative deliveries

    • Fewer reports of dissatisfaction with experience 

    • Less cesarean (RR 0.75 in Cochrane review) → suggesting potential for cost-effectiveness

    • Less likely to have 5-minute Apgar <7 (RR 0.62)

  • Continuous labor support can come in the form of:

    • Doulas: individuals with some degree of training in continuous labor support

      • There are official doula certification programs, as well as those who are truly “lay doulas” if you will.

    • Friends/family: an RCT of 600 patients demonstrated teaching labor support techniques to friends/family in labor room was effective, reducing labor duration and had higher Apgar scores.

    • Tech? The pandemic has definitely increased interest in virtual or mobile doula apps… though evidence is sparse.

Nonpharmacologic Techniques for Coping

  • “Coping” -- a better and more complete way to assess labor pain, and denotes some normal, physiologic discomfort with labor. 

    • Asking the patient how they are “coping” also can provide a way to assess other factors which may influence pain or its experience, such as anxiety or support.

  • Few non-pharmacologic techniques have been well-studied to determine effectiveness or comparative effectiveness. There are trials, but with substantial heterogeneity in their techniques and application. 

    • However, some options:

      • Water immersion: has been shown in observational trials to lower pain scores without evidence of harm in 1st stage of labor

      • Intradermal sterile water injections

      • Acupuncture/massage

      • TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation)

      • Aromatherapy

      • Audioanalgesia

      • Additional shout out to Rebcca Dekker, PhD RN, who runs the Evidence Based Birth website and has a really excellent and frequently updated series on pain management in labor

        • Her book, Babies Are Not Pizzas, is also a worthwhile look at our own potential biases as obstetricians / trainees from a combined patient and birth professional perspective.

Obstetrical Management of Labor and Delivery

Latent Labor: When to admit?

  • We’ve all been there: on the fence about whether and when to admit the patient in latent or early labor.

  • Observational trials associate early admission with:

    • More labor arrest

    • More oxytocin use

    • More IUPC use

    • More antibiotic use for fevers

    • More cesarean delivery in active phase

      • Importantly, these studies cannot determine whether this was directly associated with presenting to the hospital for care, or if those with a “dysfunctional” latent phase are more likely to present and thus skew these results.

  • RCTs:

    • Delayed (awaiting active phase) vs early (on presentation) admission:

      • Delayed group had lower rates of epidural use and labor augmentation

      • Delayed group had greater satisfaction

      • Delayed group spent less time in L&D

      • NO difference in operative delivery, cesarean delivery, and newborn outcomes (though too small to be powered sufficiently).

    • ARRIVE trial

      • Induction at 39 weeks versus awaiting spontaneous labor/medical induction

        • LESS cesarean delivery in 39 week IOL group (18.6 vs 22.2%)

        • NO difference in neonatal outcomes

          • Rates of spontaneous labor in the expectant management group are not reported/compared, and admission practices in this group are not reported (i.e., rate of early admission in latent labor / need for augmentation / etc)

          • So ARRIVE trial does not answer the question of whether spontaneous labor is better, but does provide a data point to suggest equipoise/potential benefit between 39 week induction and awaiting spontaneous labor, whether it comes or not. 

            • Important to keep in mind as you counsel patients re: 39 week inductions.

    • Admission may be necessary for a variety of reasons, including pain management and fatigue, and this can be used as a time to implement/supplement coping strategies (as previously discussed)

Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes (PROM): To Induce or Not to Induce?

  • A super common scenario, in which there are a number of potential patient questions:

    • Do I need to induce right away, or can I wait for spontaneous labor?

    • If I wait, how long can I wait?

    • If I don’t wait, what is the best method to start labor?

  • Historical studies have demonstrated ~78% of patients will labor within 12 hours, and 95% in 24-28 hours after PROM.

    • TERMPROM RCT: induction vs expectant management of PROM

      • 4-armed RCT: immediate induction arms (oxytocin vs prostin gel), and expectant mgmt arms (where given up to 4 days PROM’d or clinical concern for chorio before being induced).

      • Median time to delivery for expt mgmt arms were 33 hrs, 95% delivering by 94-107 hours after rupture.

  • However, immediate induction can reduce other risks (based on systematic review, where 60% of patients were TERMPROM trial):

    • Decreased time to delivery by 10 hours

    • Chorioamnionitis / endometritis decreased (RR 0.49)

    • Early onset neonatal sepsis decreased (RR 0.73)

    • NICU admission decreased (RR 0.75)

      • Importantly, the overall quality of evidence for neonatal outcomes in particular is low, and additional RCTs in this space are welcomed! 

  • In terms of methods, TERMPROM noted that # of vaginal exams and fever risks were slightly less overall with oxytocin

    • Though the prostaglandin used here was vaginal gel, so likely increased # of exams

    • Time to delivery was similar in both groups

    • Other trials have not found significant benefits to prostaglandin vs oxytocin

    • Some other trials have evaluated balloon catheter use in PROM

      • Potentially increased infection risk, especially if used alone (9.7% vs 2.9% in oxytocin alone)

      • With respect to combining balloon with pharmacologic agent, appears to be no benefit to ballon + oxytocin vs oxytocin alone (though small numbers overall evaluating this)

  • So back to our initial questions:

    • Do I need to induce right away, or can I wait for spontaneous labor?

    • If I wait, how long can I wait?

    • If I don’t wait, what is the best method to start labor?

      • It’s reasonable to wait some time for spontaneous labor, based on TERMPROM data suggesting almost 80% of patients will labor by 12 hours after PROM. 

        • However, patients should be aware of potentially increased risk 

        • If GBS+, patients should be started on PCN to reduce neonate GBS sepsis risk.

      • Oxytocin seems to be the best agent, though evidence is somewhat limited overall.

Intermittent Auscultation of Fetal Heart Rate

  • cEFM has unfortunately not been shown to significantly affect outcomes like perinatal death or cerebral palsy rates, but has become entrenched in OB practice.

  • IA can be used in low risk patients and potentially decrease risk of cesarean:

    • Cochrane review of 13 RCTs, cEFM vs IA. cEFM:

      • Increased CD risk (RR 1.63)

      • Increased operative vaginal delivery risk (RR 1.15)

      • Decreased risk of early neonatal seizures (RR 0.50)

      • No difference in rates of CP or neonatal death, and no difference in outcomes at 4 years of age.

    • Low risk is very important to define! Inclusion criteria for IA varies by institution, but generally:

      • No meconium staining, intrapartum bleeding, or abnormal fetal testing before admission

      • No fetal conditions that may increase risk (i.e., anomalies, FGR)

      • No maternal conditions that may increase risk (i.e., TOLAC, DM, HTN)

      • No requirement for induction or augmentation of labor (i.e., spontaneous normal labor only)

  • ACNM and Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN) have excellent guidelines and protocols for IA for nursing in particular.

Routine Amniotomy

  • Depending on where you are and practice patterns, this might be one of the most controversial things in labor management! 

  • “Routine amniotomy in spontaneous labor” 

    • Notably, this separates out when amniotomy is indicated, such as to facilitate FSE/IUPC or for slow labor progress in combination with oxytocin. 

    • This essentially is looking at just the role of amniotomy then in spontaneous labor

  • Amniotomy alone:

    • Doesn’t shorten duration of spontaneous labor

    • Doesn’t reduce incidence of cesarean

    • Doesn’t reduce patient satisfaction

    • Doesn’t reduce rates of 5 min Apgar score <7

    • Doesn’t increase rates of abnormal FHR pattern

    • Doesn’t increase rates of cord prolapse

  • So is there a reason?

    • Not to do routinely -- reserve in spontaneous labor to facilitate monitoring or interventions if indicated

  • How about within the context of labor induction?? -- that’s what you’re really wanting to know!

    • 14 trial meta-analysis:

      • When used alongside oxytocin:

        • Decreased length of first stage of labor (1.11 hrs)

        • Modest reduction in cesarean birth rate (RR 0.87 vs expectant mgmt)

    • 4 trial meta-analysis comparing “early” vs “late” amniotomy after cervical ripening:

      • Early = before active phase; late = after active phase, or awaiting SROM

        • Similar rates of cesarean (RR 1.05)

        • Early amniotomy with faster interval to delivery (5 hours)

        • SVD rates overall similar between groups, though technically reduced in early group on basis of single trial (67.5% vs 69.1%)

        • No increased risk of cord prolapse, hemorrhage, abruption, chorio, neonatal outcomes 

      • Takeaway:

        • AROM is reasonable, when indicated to facilitate monitoring, especially if oxytocin already started.

        • May reduce time to delivery without necessarily increasing other risks.

        • Very little data to guide this overall, so more study welcomed!

Immediate versus Delayed Pushing

  • The CO qualifies and speaks specifically to nulliparous patients with epidural analgesia being allowed to “passively descend” or “labor down” once identified to be 10cm.

    • The potential benefit to this is to allow the fetus to passively rotate and descend in the pelvis and conserve maternal energy.

  • Importantly, studies that have looked at risk of adverse outcomes with length of second stage (i.e., Consortium on Safe Labor data informing the ACOG/SMFM Obstetric Care Consensus about recommended length of time to push) do not take into account duration of passive descent vs active pushing, just total time in 2nd stage.

  • Data reviewed in the CO:

    • 2 meta-analyses of RCTs demonstrate delayed pushing 1-2 hours:

      • Increases length of 2nd stage by approx 1 hour

      • Decreases pushing length by approx 20 minutes

      • No difference in SVD rate

    • Recent 2018 RCT that you probably saw in JAMA, delay pushing 60 mins vs immediate pushing (again in nullips with an epidural):

      • Trial stopped before intended recruitment because of increased morbidity in the delayed group.

      • No difference in SVD rate

      • Immediate pushing resulted in:

        • Lower rates of chorio (RR 0.7)

        • Lower rates of PP hemorrhage (RR 0.6)

        • Lower risk of neonatal acidemia (RR 0.7)

  • Overall, delayed pushing in the nullipara with an epidural seems to not confer benefit, and likely increases risk for harm.