BRCA for the OB/GYN

Here’s the RoshReview Question of the Week:

A 37-year-old woman presents to your office for health care maintenance. She reports that her maternal cousin was diagnosed with advanced-stage breast cancer at the age of 35. Genetic testing was performed, and her relative tested positive for breast cancer susceptibility gene 1. Which of the following is associated with this condition?

Check your answer at the links above!


Follow along with ACOG PB 182

What are we talking about, exactly?

  • Certain germline mutations predispose patients to heritably higher risk of breast and ovarian cancer

  • In particular, you have probably heard of BRCA1 and BRCA2

    • Others you may or may not have heard of include: 

      • Lynch syndrome genes (MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, PMS2)

      • PTEN

      • TP53 (Li-Fraumeni syndrome), and 

      • STK11 (Peutz-Jehger Syndrome), just to name a few!

  • However, we’ll spend today’s podcast focusing on BRCA specifically.

What exactly are the BRCA risks?

  • Estimates of carrier frequency range from 1/300 to 1/800 for either genes.

  • BRCA1 is found on Chr 17

  • BRCA2 is found on Chr 13

  • Both are tumor suppressor genes that function in DNA repair process.

    • The inherited mutation is non-functional or defective allele in some way, but patients usually have a second, functional copy.

    • If the second allele becomes nonfunctional due to somatic mutation, cancer can develop – 

      • Two-hit hypothesis of tumor suppressor genes.

  • Risk of breast cancer in person without BRCA by age 70: ~12% (1/8)

    • Risk in patient by age 70 with BRCA1/2: 45-85%

      • Also more likely to be “triple negative” breast cancer for hormone and HER2 receptor

  • Risk of ovarian / fallopian tube / primary peritoneal cancer:

    • BRCA1: 39-46% by age 70

    • BRCA2: 10-27% by age 70

    • Both associated with high grade, serous or endometrioid phenotype

  • BRCA1/2 also associated with prostate, pancreatic, uterine cancers as well as melanoma

Who should I send for genetic counseling?

  • If your patient has a new cancer, genetics recommended:

    • New ovarian epithelial cancers (including fallopian tube or primary peritoneal)

    • Breast cancer at age 45 or less;

    • Breast cancer, and have a close relative with breast cancer at age 50 or less, or a relative with ovarian cancers at any age; or with limited/unknown family history

    • Breast cancer with two or more relatives affected by breast cancer at any age

    • Breast cancer and two or more close relatives with pancreatic cancer or aggressive prostate cancer

    • Two breast cancer primaries, with the first diagnosed under age 50

    • Triple negative breast cancer at under age 60

    • Breast cancer and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry at any age

    • Pnacreatic cancer and have 2+ close relatives with breast, ovarian, pancreatic, or aggressive prostate cancer

  • If your patient does not have a new cancer, genetics recommended based on the history of:

    • A first-degree or several close relatives that meet the above criteria

    • A close relative carrying a known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation

    • A close relative with male breast cancer

  • If you’re not sure but the history seems high risk, a referral to cancer genetics to discuss is always worthwhile – the histories above should definitely prompt your referral though! 

  • And as you’re taking family history - it bears special mention that both maternal and paternal histories are important!

    • Especially given association with male breast CA, prostate CA, melanoma – be sure to get both sides!

  • Genetics may recommend performing BRCA mutation testing, which can have a variety of possible outcomes:

    • True positive: pathogenic BRCA variant identified

    • True negative: no pathogenic variant identified in someone who has known BRCA variant in family

    • Uninformative negative: no pathogenic variant identified, but uninformative because of:

      • a) other family members not tested

      • b) family carries a variant, but it was not detected because of test limitations

      • c) family carries a high risk mutation in another gene

      • d) there is no high risk mutation

    • Variant of uncertain significance (VUS): abnormality detected in BRCA gene, but unknown whether the variant is associated with increased cancer risk

  • Patients should be informed about the possible outcomes before undergoing genetic testing so they are aware of potential limitations and importance of family testing.

    • Unintended consequences of testing can include anxiety/stress and family dynamic issues regarding need for disclosure.

  • Multigene panel testing also exists to look for mutations beyond BRCA and can be suggested by genetic counselors if indicated. 

How do I counsel and care for the patient with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation?

Screening

  • Breast:  broken out by age:

    • Age 25-29: clinical breast exam every 6-12 months and annual screen (preferably by MRI with contrast)

      • Avoid ionizing radiation at this younger age as this may increase risk of cancer

    • Age 30+: Annual breast mammography and MRI, generally alternating every 6 months, as well as continuing CBE q6-12 months

  • Ovarian:

    • TVUS and CA-125 monitoring routinely is not recommended

      • However, could be considered for short term surveillance around age 30-35 until patient undergoes risk-reducing BSO.

Medical

  • Breast:

    • Tamoxifen and raloxifene can be considered (SERMs)

      • Can be considered in patients age 35 or older and not planning on pregnancy, or on prophylactic mastectomy

      • Tamoxifen is used in pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women, and may reduce breast cancer risk by 62% in BRCA2 carriers, but has not been found to reduce risk of cancer in BRCA1 carriers (likely due to higher triple-negative rates in this pop)

      • Raloxifene has been found to be effective in reducing invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women at increased risk, though not evaluated specifically in BRCA mutation carriers

        • Tamoxifen may have a more significant risk reduction based on one head-to-head trial

      • Recall side effects of SERMs: vasomotor symptoms, vaginal symptoms (dryness, itching, dyspareunia), and increased risk of VTE!

      • Tamoxifen: also associated with concern for endometrial hyperplasia. While generally preferred in pre-menopausal patients, consider this in patietns with risk factors for endometrial hyperplasia!

      • Raloxifene: other significant side effect is leg cramps! Does not act on endometrium so may be considered in patients with significant risk factors. 

    • Aromatase inhibitors

      • Two trials have shown reduction in breast cancer risk in at-risk postmenopausal individuals; could be considered as alternative if contraindication to SERM

      • Not used in premenopausal women because it would end up actually stimulating ovarian function (i.e., ovulation induction)

  • Ovarian:

    • OCPs are reasonable to use for cancer prophylaxis until BSO:

      • Reduction of ovarian cancer risk estimated at 33-80% for BRCA1, 58-63% for BRCA2

      • No increased risk of breast cancer in those with BRCA mutations using OCPs

Surgical

  • Breast: bilateral mastectomy

    • Can be offered to any patient with BRCA mutation; reduces risk by 85-100%, depending on procedure type

    • However, this is big surgery - should be referred to breast surgeon to discuss risks of surgery in short term (surgical issues like hematomas, flap issues, infection) and long-term (pain, numbness, swelling, breast hardnes)

      • 70+% of patients report satisfaction with choice to undergo mastectomy at a follow up of 14.5 years

  • Ovarian: bilateral salpingoophorectomy

    • Most effective option for risk reduction; should be considered by age 35-40 for BRCA1 patients, 40-45 for BRCA2 patients

      • This can be individualized based on patient’s family history and plans for childbearing

      • Also worth discussion of fertility-preservation with oocyte or embryo cryoperservation

    • Salpingectomy alone is not recommended at this time; however, the PB notes that salpingectomy followed by future oophorectomy could be reasonable to consider for some patients desiring this.

    • How to perform a risk-reducing BSO:

      • Perform a survey on entry - visualize peritoneal surfaces for any obvious disease and perform pelvic washings

        • Inspect diaphragm, liver, omentum, bowel, paracolic gutters, appendix, ovaries, falliopian tubes, uterus, bladder serosa, and cul-de-sac; biopsy any abnormal areas

      • All tissue from ovaries and fallopian tubes need to be removed!

        • Ligate IP 2cm proximal to the end of identifiable ovarian tissue

          • Beware of your ureter!

        • If hysterectomy not performed, tubes should be divided at insertion to cornua, and ovary removed from utero-ovarian ligament as close to uterus as possible.

      • Frozen pathology not necessary, as most malignancies identified from this procedure are occult

        • Your pathologist needs to know that the patient is BRCA-carrier though! This will prompt them to perform complete, serial sectioning of the tissue with microscopic screening (rather than representative sections typically performed with other benign BSO)

    • Hysterectomy can be considered simultaneously:

      • Advantages: simplifies hormone therapy (estrogen alone, vs E-P if retained); removal of cornual aspect of fallopian tube; reduce endometrial cancer risk if genetically-predisposed or taking tamoxifen

      • Disadvantages: bigger surgery, longer recovery, higher risk of complications from surgery

    • After BSO:

      • Patients who are premenopausal will need HRT to mitigate effects of early menopause and help with cardiovascular health and bone protection

        • Recall that HRT in the WHI increased risk of breast cancer in the estrogen-progesterone arm, but not in the estrogen-alone arm.

        • Given the higher rates of triple-negative breast cancer in BRCA population – HRT would not alter that course. Data suggests that HRT does not seem to reduce the protective effects of risk-reducing surgery overall.

      • In post-menopausal patients, this is controversial – other options are generally preferred to HRT for VMS management.

      • Local estrogen therapy for vaginal symptoms (genitourinary syndrome of menopause) is safe and effective in BRCA population – please use it! 

      • Ongoing surveillance after BSO is not necessary - so no need to collect CA125 or perform surveillance imaging. Patients should report any concerning symptoms.

Breast Cancers and Treatment Knowledge for the OB/GYN

Today we welcome back Dr. Edmonson for part II of our breast cancer chat. Check out last week’s post for screening and imaging information.

From a radiographically-guided core breast biopsy, there’s a lot of things that can come back. Today we’ll focus on the pathologic concerns. Dr. Edmonson breaks this down into:

Atypical Ductal Hyperplasias / Atypical Lobular Hyperplasias / Lobular Carcinoma in Situ
These lesions predict a risk for breast cancer in the future, but are not actually cancer. These are all managed surgically, with an approximately 15% upstaging rate on final pathology after excision, most pronounced with ADH. The risk models we discussed last episode can then give an updated risk of breast cancer which may alter screening strategy (i.e., if risk exceeds 20%, MRI may be used as an adjunct). Additionally, using risk-reducing medications such as tamoxifen or raloxifene may also become appropriate.

Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)
These are non-invasive cancers which require lumpectomy or potentially mastectomy. Thereafter, radiation is usually recommended as well as risk-reducing medications such as tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole. There is a 20-30% upstaging risk at time of surgery, and additionally additional surgery may be required to get negative surgical margins as there is no reliable intraoperative technique to detect margins.

Invasive Cancers (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma or Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
With invasive cancer, different strategies exist. Surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy may be considered based on extent of disease to reduce morbidity of surgery (i.e., more limited lymph node dissection which would reduce risk of lymphedema from axillary dissection). New surgical techniques exist now as well including lymphatic reanastamosis that is helping to improve morbidity after these surgeries.

Invasive lobular carcinoma can be difficult to identify. These are less aggressive, but they often don’t show up well on imaging and are difficult pre-operatively to get good margins.

After A Diagnosis
OB/GYNs can help to reassure patients and connect them to breast surgeons. Fewer breast cancers are requiring chemotherapy, which is often a patient’s greatest fear. Surgical techniques are improving and reconstruction is widely available, including skin-sparing and nipple-sparing techniques.

Screening will be guided by the breast surgeon. This depends more and more on the individual, the pathology and tumor characteristics, and risk for local recurrence. Recall that patients on tamoxifen are at higher risk of VTE and at higher risk of endometrial hyperplasia.

Breast Imaging and Density

Today we welcome Dr. David Edmonson, assistant professor in surgery and obstetrics and gynecology at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. Dr. Edmonson is an expert in breast disease and a surgical oncologist. Today he talks with us on imaging and breast density.

Mammography results can be classified into the BI-RADS (“Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System”) categories — it’s worthwhile to remember these categories and what the likelihood of malignancy is:

(c) Radiology Assistant

(c) Radiology Assistant

Mammography will also often report breast density. Breast density can hinder the utility of mammography, and depending on your area of practice, may suggest or require additional study. Dr. Edmonson does note that breast density requirements do have limited data, but are the subject of active study.

You can use risk models to help assess need for additional imaging: the Tyrer Cuzick or Gail models can be utilized, taking into account different risk factors.

To find out more about breast imaging and density, check out the immensely helpful DenseBreast-Info.org. On their website, there are multiple opportunities to expand your knowledge, including the CME opportunity Breast Density: Why It Matters as well as an FAQ for healthcare providers.